📊 Snow day? There's a market for that

GM. You’re reading PredictionDesk, the daily newsletter that helps you become a prediction markets expert in under 5 minutes.

Here’s what we got for you today:

• ❄️ Bettors wagered $6M on NYC snowfall and the crowd got it right

• 🏈 The many different types of market trading

• ⚽ MLS signs multiyear deal with Polymarket

• 📈 Market Moves

• 📊 Odds & Ends

Winter Storm Fern brought more than 11 inches of snow to Central Park over the weekend. It also brought more than $6 million in bets to Kalshi and Polymarket from traders wagering on exactly that outcome.

Polymarket's NYC snowfall market drew more than $1.2 million in volume, with the most popular wager in the 10-12 inch range. The top bettor scooped up more than 8,100 shares at 61 cents apiece, betting on that same bracket. Kalshi saw even heavier action: $5 million wagered as of Monday morning, with the market pricing in a 99% chance of more than 10 inches. Both platforms resolve based on official government data, with Polymarket pulling from NOAA's Central Park readings and Kalshi relying on the National Weather Service.

The crowd got it almost exactly right. Central Park officially recorded 11.4 inches. The market consensus going into the weekend was 11 inches. Compare that to the Maduro bet earlier this month, where an anonymous trader pocketed $463,000 by correctly predicting the Venezuelan leader's capture just hours before a surprise U.S. raid. That one raised obvious questions about insider knowledge. Snowfall totals, on the other hand, are a bit harder to game.

Bettors also wagered on snowfall in Washington, D.C. and whether cities like Atlanta and Seattle would see any snow at all. Boston markets showed more than 67% of traders expecting 15+ inches, and they weren't far off. Logan Airport recorded 16.7 inches.

Weather markets have been a growing category for Kalshi, which has positioned them as hedging tools for industries like agriculture and insurance. A farmer can bet on a specific temperature drop rather than buy a broad weather derivative. The storm itself was devastating. But for traders, it was a clean, liquid market with a verifiable outcome.

PREDICTION MARKETS V. SPORTSBOOKS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? 🏈

Prediction markets and sportsbooks look similar on the surface, as both let you put money on an outcome, but beneath that shared interface, they represent very different philosophies about how truth, risk, and incentives should be organized. One is built as entertainment with guardrails, the other as a market that assumes participants will police reality themselves. Lumping them together as “betting” misses the more important story, which is that these systems are converging in use while diverging in intent, and that divergence is starting to matter.

A sportsbook is a closed economy with a central planner. The house sets the line, manages exposure, and decides when a price is wrong enough to move. Its goal is not to predict the future accurately but to balance action while collecting margin. Skill is tolerated only to the extent that it does not threaten that equilibrium. Limits appear precisely when someone proves they can see the board more clearly than the operator would like. The sharp exists, but only as an adversary, and only for as long as the house allows them to play.

Prediction markets flip that relationship. There is no house opinion to fade and no line to protect. Prices emerge from the interaction of traders who are incentivized to correct errors as quickly as possible. If the market is wrong, it is an invitation to trade as opposed to a failure of the platform. The sharp is the primary source of legitimacy for the system. Accuracy is the mechanism by which capital flows toward those who can convert information into probability faster than everyone else.

This difference changes behavior in subtle but important ways. Sportsbooks reward narratives, fandom, and emotional attachment because those things increase volume and tolerance for bad pricing. Prediction markets reward precision, contract literacy, and timing because those things move prices and extract value. One environment encourages you to think in terms of teams and heroes. The other encourages you to think in terms of settlement criteria and edge. Even when the underlying event is the same game, the mental posture of the participant is fundamentally different.

The regulatory split reinforces this divergence. Sportsbooks live under state gaming regimes designed to contain harm and preserve the idea of gambling as leisure. Prediction markets live under federal commodities oversight that assumes participation is purposeful and informational. That distinction shapes who feels comfortable showing up. Institutions know how to navigate commodity rules. Professionals understand position limits and compliance risk. As a result, prediction markets quietly attract actors who would never touch a sportsbook account, not because they dislike betting, but because they recognize a market when they see one.

What is emerging is a parallel system for monetizing belief. These markets turn opinions into positions and positions into prices, forcing participants to confront the cost of being wrong in real time. There is no pundit immunity and no narrative cushioning. If your view is bad, the market will take your money and give it to someone who saw the world more clearly.

The convergence between sportsbooks and prediction markets is therefore misleading. They may share interfaces, outcomes, and occasionally users, but they are optimized for different truths. One exists to entertain at scale. The other exists to aggregate information under financial pressure. As prediction markets grow, the question becomes whether people will continue to accept a system where the house decides what the truth costs, when an alternative exists that lets reality itself do the pricing.

MLS WANTS FANS IN CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS. POLYMARKET CAN REACH THEM. ⚽

MLS announced a multiyear partnership with Polymarket yesterday, becoming the second major U.S. professional league to strike a deal with a prediction market. The NHL was first, signing with Kalshi last October. Both deals share the same logic: prediction markets can operate in all 50 states, including California and Texas, where sports betting remains illegal.

That geographic advantage is doing a lot of work for Polymarket right now. Chris Schlosser, MLS's senior vice president of emerging ventures, told ESPN that reaching soccer fans in states without legal sports betting was "intriguing" to the league. The deal includes real-time market data integrations during matches and seasons, letting fans follow trading activity on outcomes like match winners or the MLS Cup.

MLS is framing the deal partly as an integrity play. "If we want to ensure the integrity of our sport, we really need to lean in and figure out how best to partner with them," Schlosser said. The partnership includes monitoring from IC360 and Sportradar, plus trading bans for players, referees, league staff, and owners. Players are also barred from NIL deals (Name, Image, and Likeness) with prediction markets and sports betting platforms.

The timing is awkward. Earlier this month, Nevada's Gaming Control Board filed a complaint to block Polymarket from offering sports-related contracts, alleging they violate state wagering laws. Multiple state regulators have filed similar suits against Kalshi. Both companies argue they're federally regulated by the CFTC and don't fall under state gambling jurisdiction. The courts haven't settled this yet.

For now, Polymarket remains invite-only in the U.S. with would-be users stuck on a wait list. But the MLS deal signals that leagues aren't waiting for regulators to sort things out. They're moving ahead with the assumption that prediction markets will be part of the sports fan experience, legal fights or not. The NHL set the template. MLS followed. The question now is who's next.

MARKET MOVES 📈

📈 Biggest swing: “Will USD reach 1.5M Iranian rials by January 31?” moved 10% → 63% (Polymarket)

💰 Top earner: @432614799197 - $442,014 24H Profit (Polymarket)

🤔 Weirdest market: “U.S. strike on Somalia by January 31?” (Polymarket)

ODDS & ENDS 📊

• Prediction markets cross $20B in trading on BNB Chain.

• Kalshi leads prediction markets with $2.25B in 7-day notional volume with Opinion and Polymarket trailing close behind.

• Clawdbot scores a 400% return on 15-minute bitcoin markets in just a few days

RATE TODAY’S EDITION

MEME OF THE DAY 😂

Dalio: “Stocks Only Look Strong in Dollar Terms.” Here’s a Globally Priced Alternative for Diversification.

Ray Dalio recently reported that much of the S&P 500’s 2025 gains came not from real growth, but from the dollar quietly losing value. Reportedly down 10% last year!

He’s not alone. Several BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bloomberg analysts say to expect further dollar decline in 2026.

So, even when your U.S. assets look “up,” your purchasing power may actually be down.

Which is why many investors are adding globally priced, scarce assets to their portfolios—like art.

Art is traded on a global stage, making it largely resistant to currency swings.

Now, Masterworks is opening access to invest in artworks featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso as a low-correlation asset class with attractive appreciation historically (1995-2025).*

Masterworks’ 26 sales have yielded annualized net returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8%.

They handle the sourcing, storage, and sale. You just click to invest.

Special offer for my subscribers:

Skip waitlist

_{*Based on Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd.}